When umpire Anil Chaudhary changed his decision from a no-ball to a wide, during the very tense moment in Match 51 of IPL 2021 between Delhi Capitals and Chennai Super Kings, it was one of the many occasions that an umpire’s decision was scrutinized for all the wrong reasons. CSK’s Dwayne Bravo had six runs to defend in the final over of the match against DC and he started will a wide delivery, which did not even land on the pitch. DC batters scampered for a run as the ball, out of reach of the keeper MS Dhoni, rolled towards a short third man. Chaudhary initially signaled it as a no-ball – correct decision as per MCC Law’s of Cricket– but after a consultation with the TV umpire the on-field umpire changed his decision to a wide. DC ended up earning two runs without losing a delivery. However, if the original decision was upheld, DC would have also got a free-hit to boot. For Indian captain, Sunil Gavaskar, now part of the commentary team, was not amused by this and questioned Choundahry for his change of decision.

IPL 2021 Full Coverage | Schedule | Results | Points Tally | Orange Cap | Purple Cap

“That was clearly a no-ball. We’ve had a couple of decisions from TV umpires, which in these circumstances can make the difference between winning and losing, and that shouldn’t happen,” said Gavaskar while commenting on air during the match. He also went on to say that such decisions could very well impact the outcome of the match and it was a good thing that DC eventually won the game. “These kinds of decisions should not change the game. It’s a good thing Delhi won because that could have changed the game,” Gavaskar added.

The MCC’s Law of Cricket states: 21.7 Ball bouncing more than once, rolling along the ground or pitching off the pitch

The umpire shall call and signal No ball if a ball which he/she considers to have been delivered, without having previously touched bat or person of the striker,

– bounces more than once or rolls along the ground before it reaches the popping crease


– pitches wholly or partially off the pitch as defined in Law 6.1 (Area of pitch) before it reaches the line of the striker’s wicket. When a non-turf pitch is being used, this will apply to any ball that wholly or partially pitches off the artificial surface.

From No-ball to Wide – Miffed Sunil Gavaskar Questions Standard of Umpiring this IPL season

Earlier, former KKR captain Gautam Gambhir and former England player Graeme Swann was not happy with the third umpire during KKR vs PBKS after a a catch by Rahul Tripathi was not given. PBKS eventually won by 5 wickets and with 3 balls to spare. The catch in question was that of PBKS skipper KL Rahul. Had the third umpire deemed Tripathi’s catch as legal, which it would have meant Rahul’s dismissal at a crucial phase of the game.

Swann criticised the third umpire after the match. “That was the worst piece of third umpiring I have ever seen,” Swann said on Star Sports’ post-match show. Gambhir called the decision a ‘shocker’.

In another incident, during RCB vs PBKS match at Sharjah, in the eighth over of RCB innings batter, Devdutt Padikkal tried to play a reverse scoop and nicked it to KL Rahul. As the onfield umpire gave it not out, PBKS took the review to no avail. Despite the UltraEdge showing a clear spike as the ball zoomed to the wicketkeeper, the third umpire retained the ground umpire’s decision and Padikkal survived the DRS call.

Get all the IPL news and Cricket Score here


Source link